Post 7
It is often said that those who
prepare for the worst will succeed more than those who expect the best every
time. Similarly, in the modern age with countless innovations and endless
research, it is important that humans place important emphasis on developing a
method that would prevent unintended consequences or failure. Intelligent trial
and error is the best way to ensure that, “the ratio of good to bad” (69) is
high and there is more benefit for the world than harm.
Intelligent trial and error should
be implemented on all levels of innovation, particularly on those that could
potentially impact the environment or other people. The first example of a
situation in which intelligent trial and error was not applied and resulted in
danger to health would be lead paint. From the image below one can see that
before 1940, 87% of homes built were painted with lead paint, between 1940 and
1959, 69% of homes had lead paint, and between 1960 and 1977 24% of homes had
it. Many died due to lead poisoning either by inhaling the toxic fumes over
time, or if the lead entered the water flow because it was corroding from the
pipes. A simple trial and error test could have prevented many deaths and kept
the overall population safer.
Another example of where intelligent trial and
error testing could have prevented consequences is with Chlorofluorocarbons
(CFCs). CFCs were once often
used as propellants in aerosol cans; however, scientists noticed that the ozone
layer was becoming weaker at a faster rate. Scientists realized that CFCs in
aerosol cans were the cause of this rapid increase, and when the Montreal
Protocol came into force in 1989, CFCs were replaced in nearly every country
due to the negative effects. If the scientists and engineers had collaborated
and used trial and error testing while offering their respective inputs, this
situation could easily have been prevented and our ozone layer, which protects
us from harmful ultraviolet rays, would be stronger than it is today.
Based on examples from history and
personal experience, the majority of consequences can be prevented by
intelligent trial and error testing. From the examples above, it easy to
realize that trial and error testing is effective and efficient given the
proper investment of time and money. Despite the “three main pitfalls” (70) of
trial and error testing, it is still the best option for preventing disasters
and unintended consequences for humans and the environment.

No comments:
Post a Comment